WPLC Board Meeting Minutes: March 9,
2005
Location: South Central Library System
Present: Stef Morrill (SCLS), Mark Arend (WLS), Peg Zappen (WRLS),
David Weinhold (ESLS), Michael Sheehan (NWLS), Evan Bend (OWLS), Mark
Merrifield (NLS), Peggy Shaffer (LLS), Steve Platteter (MWLS), Steve
Heser (MCFLS), Mellanie Mercier (WCFLS), Linda Miller, Project Manager,
and Kathy Schneider, WiLS.
1. Reports from Partners
Nicolet and OWLS have questions about how the new ILS vendor will
integrate with OverDrive.
MWFLS is focusing on developing a shared system for automation.
MCFLS is working on member renewals.
OWLS is planning system migration and has a subscription for Learning
Express.
ESLS continues to see strong use of netLibrary and is working to allow
patrons to remotely create a netLibrary account.
NWLS has completed importing records for netLibrary titles and has
seen an increase in use.
WCFLS hopes to get MARC records into CAFÉ’s database
this summer.
SCLS has implemented a new authentication method.
2. E-book Services
Kathy reported that 300-400 titles are ready to be ordered. The online
introductory netLibrary course which recently finished got great reviews,
but only six persons completed the course. WiLS may investigate developing
a self-paced course or may condense the course into a shorter time
period.
Board members encouraged WiLS to offer the current course again and
to promote the course in new ways. WPLC partners were also encouraged
to distribute such announcements to their own internal system mailing
lists, which some members are already doing.
Ripon High School is interested in possibly joining to share the netLibrary
collection, and WiLS staff is working with the school. Kathy also mentioned
that Recorded Books has been contacting libraries to purchase audio
books.
Recorded Books has partnered with netLibrary.
Linda shared that she had contacted Hedberg PL regarding membership
in WPLC after learning of the library’s interest in netLibrary
and is awaiting word of any further interest by the library.
The discussion then turned to continued consideration of a contract
with OverDrive. Kathy reported that the consortium in Michigan is very
satisfied. This confirmed the information that WPLC members had previously
collected from this group.
Stef reported that SCLS IT staff had some concerns about allowing
the SIP2 connection through the firewall. They have discussed the matter
with OverDrive IT staff. MWFLS expects more interest in OverDrive’s
e-books and audiobooks than the current netLibrary plan. OWLS reports
that its libraries are more interested in the audiobooks than e-books
and would like to see current WPLC funds reallocated from netLibrary
to OverDrive titles.
Additional content could be purchased for the OverDrive collection
than is allocated in the OverDrive contract. However, if individual
libraries purchase content, it is not possible to restrict access to
that library.
Mark Arend wants to be sure that the collection includes a sufficient
collection of audio books. Mead in Sheboygan wants e-books and audiobooks
to supplement the netLibrary collection. Possible funding for content
could come from library collection development funds. Grants should
also be investigated. Linda shared that the Regional Library for the
Blind and Physically Handicapped has expressed interest in OverDrive
audiobooks.
OverDrive has a pilot project with five states to provide audiobooks
for the Regional Libraries.
Costs for the OverDrive service were reviewed. Linda shared information
from OverDrive which clarified the point regarding how OverDrive uses
integrated library systems to calculate the number of ILS systems covered.
OverDrive counts as one each individual database or shared or standalone
system with which it needs to connect. The number of different vendors
ILS systems that are in use in the state is not a factor in determining
costs.
The factor is the number of individual ILSs. Project management costs
were included in determining the overall project cost. These are to
cover WiLS expenses and for WPLC project management.
A tally of partners’ interest showed that all partners are interested,
but a few have reservations about participating at this time. ESLS
is not sure how to get the funding. MWFLS believes that it will need
to wait until there is one shared system in place rather than try to
implement OverDrive with the multiple automation systems in place now.
Lakeshores stated that it cannot participate now because it does not
have the funds.
Board members reviewed the decision made at the previous meeting which
stated that WPLC would cover the first six months and then partners
and libraries would share the costs. Some members stated that they
needed to discuss with their libraries whether that was possible. LSTA
grants for
2006 were mentioned as one possible source. MWFLS may consider rolling
the costs into the shared ILS project. Mellanie mentioned the possibility
of corporate sponsorships.
Questions raised included how quickly could a collection be developed;
what should the mix of e-books and audiobooks be; will systems be charged
the $1500 OverDrive setup fee if they migrate to a new ILS.
The cost sharing proposal presented shared costs evenly among the
partners.
Board members requested that a alternate model be developed that shared
costs on the same basis as the WPLC membership dues scale and that
the decision made at the January meeting regarding WPLC’s share
be revisited at the next meeting. All WPLC members should be encouraged
to participate in the project. The issue of the $1500 fee for ILS systems
beyond the first eight was discussed. The group agreed that each partner’s
first $1500 fee should be covered. Reallocation of the 2005 WPLC funds
for netLibrary content to OverDrive content will be discussed at the
next meeting along with the new cost model.
The consensus was that Kathy should begin working with a selection
committee to select content.
3. New Projects
Kathy presented an update on the “Illinois Model” for
OCLC services. The committee is meeting and beginning negotiations
with OCLC. Questions include how to count cataloging libraries, either
as separate libraries within a consortium or as one shared system.
The first OCLC proposal counted each separately. WiLS will be sharing
information with various groups around the state and asked whether
WPLC wanted its own presentation.
Given the number and locations of other presentations, the group did
not believe that an additional presentation was necessary.
4. Next Meeting
The next meeting will be on Friday, April 15, 2005 at 10:00 AM at
the SCLS office.
Linda K. Miller
LMA Techwork
linda@lmatechwork.com
815-229-8215 voice
815-229-5362 fax